Century: 14th Century / Digital Facsimile Online: No / Repository: Bodleian Library / Subjects: documents and classical literature - Medieval Manuscripts Search Results

A catalogue of Western manuscripts at the Bodleian Libraries and selected Oxford colleges

ADVANCED SEARCH

Start Over

You searched for: Century 14th Century Digital Facsimile Online No Repository Bodleian Library Subjects documents Subjects classical literature

1 - 7 of 7

MS. Ashmole 357

Contents:: Anianus, Alcabitius, etc. — 14th century, middle
Petrus de Monte Alcino, etc. — 15th century

MS. Auct. F. 2. 1

Contents:: Ovid, etc. — 13th century

MS. Canon. Class. Lat. 260

Contents:: Valerius Maximus, Festus, etc. — 14th century, end; Italian, Veneto

MS. Lat. misc. a. 3

Contents:: Fragments, 7th-17th centuries

MS. Lat. misc. c. 75

Contents:: Collectanea of John Bale: seven manuscripts bound together

MS. Laud Misc. 402

Contents:: Lawrence of Aquileia, etc. — 13th or 14th century (?); English
William Greenfield, archbishop of York — 13th or 14th century (?); English
Seneca, etc. — 13th or 14th century (?); English
Edward III (?) — 13th or 14th century (?); English
Achard of St.-Victor, Simon of Gent, etc. — 14th century and 15th century, first half; English
Bonaventure, John Waleys, etc. — 13th or 14th century (?); English
Evangelium Nicodemi — 14th century, first half; English
Robert Grosseteste, etc. — 13th or 14th century (?); English

MS. Rawl. G. 109

Contents:: Hugo Primas, Hildebert of Lavardin, etc. — Late 12th or early 13th century. Rigg (p. 476) hypothesizes: The sequence of compilation could have been something like this: (1) Part IV, by A, with red, green and blue decoration; (2) addition of Part I by A; (3) addition of Parts II-III by B: (4) addition of Part V by C; (5) addition of Part VI; (6) quire numbering.; Rigg (p. 480), pointing to similarities between this manuscript and London, British Library, Cotton MS. Titus A. xx, argues that the manuscript was almost certainly written in England. The ‘Frenchness’ of MS. Rawl. G. 109 is explained by the fact that it is a fairly faithful copy of a lost anthology compiled some forty or fifty years earlier, probably in France.