A catalogue of Western manuscripts at the Bodleian Libraries and selected Oxford colleges

MS. Selden Supra 56

Summary Catalogue no.: 3444

Contents

Geoffrey Chaucer, Troilus and Criseyde
Final rubric: Troilus. Explicit liber Troyly et Criseide quod Chaucer Anno domini millesimo quadringentesimo quadragesimo primo Anno Regni Regis Henrici Sexti post conquestum Anglie decimonono

The scribe included incipits for each book and some Latin rubrics, e.g. 'Narrat Troilus' (fol. 9); 'Vulgus astrologus' (fol. 55), 'lamentatio Criseide' (fol. 70) and 'littera Crisede versus Troili' (fol. 103)

DIMEV 5248
Language(s): Middle English

Physical Description

Form: codex
Support: paper, with outer bifolium of vellum for many quires. Watermarks: Couronne and six-estelles in gutters (not identified in Briquet)
Extent: 106 fols
Dimensions (binding): 219 × 149 mm.
Dimensions (leaf): 215 × 143 mm.

Collation

a14 (first leaf, a blank has been pasted to front cover; that and leaf 14 are vellum); b14 (first and last leaves are vellum); c-j14; h9 (originally a quire of 14, of which 1 has been cancelled and 11-14 have been torn out; originally, 1 and 14 were vellum)

Layout

1 col., ruled in ink on three sides and containing 35-42 lines in unspaced stanzas (generally 5, sometimes 6 or intermediate) which often overrun the page

Column space: 167 × 90 mm.

Quires numbered in arabic numerals on last leaf verso of each quire

In a survey of the sizes of vernacular manuscipts, Ralph Hannah classifies MS. Selden Supra 56 as 'octavo' format, and smaller than the most common size for surviving manuscriupts of Troilus and Criseyde, which is 'late-medeival quarto' (Pursuing History: Middle English Manuscripts and Their Texts [Stanford University Press, 1996], p. 117 and p. 301). It is possible that the narrow shape of the manuscript, higher than it is wide, was to allow it to be more easily held open in one hand, perhaps for the purposes of reading the text aloud

It was not only size and format that would have been a consideration in the creation and design of this mansucript, but also weight. Daniel Sawyer speculates that one reason for the use of paper, rather than vellum, in this period came from a wish to create light -- and therefore more portable -- books of Middle English verse. Sawyer notes that MS. Selden Supra 56 'weighs little even in its surviving medieval binding' (Reading English Verse in Manuscript c.1350-c.1500 [Oxford University Press, 2020], p. 101)

Hand(s)

Verbatim copyist, with some (possibly inherited) paraphrase and omission of words

Decoration

Blank spaces were left for initials at the beginning of each proem but these were never added: fol. 1 (beginning); fol. 15v (Proem II); fol. 37v (Proem III); fol. 38 (Book III); fol. 60v (Proem IV); fol. 61 (Book IV); and fol. 82 (Book V)

Binding

Plain white sheepskin parchment on boards, clasp lost, contemporary English work (fifteenth century)

Alexandra Gillespie observes that very few well-known vernacular manuscripts have survived in their medieval bindings and that MS. Selden Supra 56 is one of only four of Chaucer’s works that has a pre-1500 cover. Gillespie names the other three Chaucer manuscripts as MS. Rawl. D. 3, Cambridge, St John’s, MS E. 2 and London, Institution of Engineering and Technology Library, MS Thompson 1 ('Bookbinding' in The Production of Books in England 1350–1500 ed. by Wakelin and Gillespie [Cambridge University Press, 2011], p. 158 and p. 165)

Hannah Ryley notes that reinforcing strips were used in this manuscript to strengthen the binding by offering support to the sewing of the quires. Ryley comments that from the reader’s point of view, these reinforcing strips are 'narrow stubs poking out from between regular leaves' and that the 'stubby strips either lie flat, because they have been pasted on to adjacent leaves, or they stand up separately'. Ryley records strips at fols 6–7, 20–21, 34-35, 48–49, 62–63, 76–77, 90–91 and 103–04, with strips adhered to fols 90–91 (Re-using Manuscripts in Late Medieval England: Repairing, Recycling, Sharing [Boydell & Brewer, 2022], p. 75). Ryley cites MS. Rawl. poet. 163 as another example of reinforcing strips in a manuscript of Troilus and Criseyde

These strips are made from what Ryley terms 'recycled material' and evidence of this is that they have traces of writing on them. Although the writing on the strips is barely legible, Ryley postulates that the strips are taken from a document of some sort, most likely from the 15th century; the date assigned by Ryley would make the recycyled document roughly contemporary with the manuscript itself. Ryley hazards that the strips on fols 14-15 may contain the name ‘John’ (Re-using Manuscripts in Late Medieval England [Boydell & Brewer, 2022], p. 76)

History

Origin: 1441 ; England. As Henry VI became king on 1 September 1422, the Explicit (see above) fixes the date that the manuscript was written to the first eight months of 1441. Language of NE Lincolnshire, mixed with a Leicestershire component (A Linguistic Atlas of Late Mediaeval English [Aberdeen, 1986], vol. 1. 152)

Provenance and Acquisition

Smudged 16th-century hand: 'Dum sum [...] vocam[...] (M. C. Seymour, The Manuscripts of Chaucer's Troilus [1992], p. 114)

'monogram in brown ink doubtfully read as 'GW' (Seymour, 'The Manuscripts of Chaucer's Troilus', p. 114)

John Selden, 1584–1654

Acquired by the Bodleian in 1659

Record Sources

Description adapted (May 2023) by Stewart J. Brookes from the Summary Catalogue (1922), with additional reference to published literature as cited

Surrogates

Fol. 87 is plate 402 of A. Watson, Catalogue of Dated and Datable Manuscripts in Oxford Libraries (1984), vol. 2
Fol. 60v is plate 23 of Robert Kilburn Root, Manuscripts of Chaucer's Troilus (1914)

Bibliography

Last Substantive Revision

2023-05-04: Description revised to incorporate all the information in the Summary Catalogue (1922)