St John's College MS 127
Richard Rolle, Works
Contents
Language(s): Latin
ed. Margaret Deanesly, The Incendium Amoris of Richard Rolle of Hampole (Manchester, 1915), 145–278 (‘the short text’), with a description of our MS at 26–7. Most of fol. 56v was originally blank. The text is described and this MS noted, Allen, 209–29. There is a major medial break at fols. 40v/41, corresponding to the division between chs. 21 and 22 (Deanesly, 107).
ed. PL 159:167 C 3–13.
chs. 12 and 15 ed. Deanesly, 177, 187.
ch. 8, ed. Deanesly, 165.
Added texts include numerous pen-trials and short pieces:
‘Si sapiens fore vis sex serua que tibi mando | Quid dicas et ubi de quo cui quomodo et quando’ (in red), Walther, no. 17963.
‘In hijs denuo ii. In die noue solennitatis mee dicit dominus precedam’; ‘Quicquid vis et non potes reputabitur pro facto quod T’; ‘Q Angelicus iuuenis senibus satanizat in annis’ (Walther, Sprichwörter, no. 1042), with glosses; ‘Est nomen virtus grauitas onus accio fama’; ‘Est dis conueniens sub vincitur in que laborat’
‘Non in carne tibi fuerit fiducia carnem | Comprime ne reprimat te viciosa caro’, Walther, Sprichwörter, no. 17892.
‘Omar?’; ‘Confitemini’ (and two other starts on the word)
Physical Description
Collation
Layout
Writing area 172 × 110 mm. (text 1) 170 × 118 mm. (text 2) 180–5 × 115–20 mm. (text 3). Written in long lines, 30 (texts 1–2) and 47 (text 3) lines to the page. No prickings or rules; bounded in brown crayon.
Hand(s)
Written in anglicana, probably by three different scribes, a booklet for each. Scribe 1 punctuates by double virgula, medial point, and occasional punctus elevatus; scribe 2 by virgula and double virgula, point, and punctus elevatus; scribe 3 by point and punctus elevatus.
Decoration
Headings in text ink, unfilled blanks for capitals (with guide letters) and rubrics.
A very few red side-notes of contents in text 1.
A drawing of a lion (fol. 7 leading edge).
Binding
Brownish leather over millboards, rough grained with a stamped rectangle at the centre, flowers at the corners, and a small floral stamped border around an inner rectangle, s. xvi ex. Sewn on five thongs. Scars on the boards suggest that there were previously ribbon ties to hold the book closed. Gold ‘127’ at the head of the spine, remains of a number in mostly flaked away black ink on the leading edges. Pastedowns modern paper, a College bookplate on the front pastedown. At the front, one modern paper flyleaf at the rear the same (ii).
History
Provenance and Acquisition
‘bloxh bloxham’ (fol. 56v), ‘Iohannes Bloxham est bonus homo sic dicit iohannes Wodestoke senior’ (fol. 78v, s. xv ex.), suggesting early ownership in Oxfordshire.
'Alexander Bifeld’ (fol. 56v, s. xv ex.).
‘Johannes Whyte de Suthwyk in Comitatu Sutht Armiger dedit hunc librum Thome White de london militi ad vsum Colegij per ipsum de nouo erecti in Oxon Anno 1555’ (fols. 1v–2, upper margin).
Record Sources
MS 127 Description corrected by Ralph Hanna 29/10/2013:
Two scribes in different sets of booklets, the first copying Incendium Amoris only (short), the second Super Canticum only. In his note at the end of the fourth section of the text (fragmentary, lines 1–110 of this edition only) on fol. 68v, the second of these scribes states that the remaining portions had been copied above – in the conventional position of ‘the compliation’ following Incendium. Unfortunately, the two copyists were not in touch with one another (although certainly working on the same project, on common paperstocks), and the first scribe had never done this work, which would have begun where scribe 2 leaves off.
However, fol. 68v is the last leaf of a four-leaf quire, the planned conclusion of the second scribe’s work here. The final quire of the entire manuscript is actually a separate fourth booklet and probably in a different hand, certainly the first five folios or so in a different ink, from the remainder. This quire includes the sixth and seventh sections of Super Canticum, along with the extra materials (mostly bits of Incendium omitted from the short version) that typify ‘the compliation’ and that the scribal note indicates he believed had been earlier copied. This quire represents a repair predicated on the discovery that the Incendium scribe had not quite completed his job. (Super Canticum here probably combines two different sources, splitting at fols 68v/69, and no one copied most of the fourth segment of this work not any of the fifth here).
Availability
For enquiries relating to this manuscript please contact St John's College Library.
Bibliography
Funding of Cataloguing
Conversion of the printed catalogue to TEI funded by the Thompson Family Charitable Trust
Abbreviations
View list of abbreviations and editorial conventions.
Last Substantive Revision
2022-11: First online publication